Sydney International Wine Competition is a competition where the wine is judged with food. It is mainly Australian wine but there are a number of New Zealand entries....There are also some entrants from Portugal, Italy, Spain and I think France. After the competition they have what they call their "Top 100" tasting which consists of any of the wines that won a Blue Gold medal...they also nominate the Top 100 out of this bunch (So you get two little stickers instead of one).
The tasting itself was fairly well run. They gave you a tasting note/score sheet that listed all of the wine and left you room to score and to write notes. They also had sheets with instructions (although no one took them) that basically said, get a taste, move away, spit when you're done, score (if you want)... The tasting glass had a little line so you knew about how much to pour (25ml..or close to 1 fl oz). There were also plenty of spit buckets all over the place so it was a pretty good setup for getting through a lot of wine. I think the only downside is they didn't have much in the way of something to clean your palate. They brought out some bread at some point but they would've just been better off with water crackers.
Overall, the tasting was a bit of a disappointment wine wise. A few really great whites...some good reds. It was definitely a good opportunity to try some reds I hadn't tried but overall most of the reds were pretty ordinary. I should know better than to think most of these types of shows would have the type of wine I really like...they tend to have a few here and there and then a lot of stuff that is decent. This is contrary to the regional shows where you get to try a good number of really great wine.
One other thing I want to comment on....There is a Pinot Noir Class, then a Lighter Bodied Red, Medium bodied Red and Full bodied Red. For everyone else this would be
Lighter Bodied Reds - Beaujolais, Valpolicella. Actual LIGHT bodied wines.
Medium bodied Reds - Pinot Noir, maybe a Hunter Shiraz, maybe a Nebbiolo or anything that is a bit lighter than a Full bodied Red.
Full Bodied Red - Cabernet Sauvignon, Shiraz, Grenache (although you can argue it is medium bodied because of the low tannins), etc, etc.
Now, you can get medium bodied wines of different varieties..but medium bodied is lowish alcohol, lighter mouthfeel.
For this show..
Lighter Bodied Red = Full Bodied Red
Medium Bodied Red = Higher Alcohol, getting into Fruit Bomb territory
Full Bodied Red = HIGH Alcohol, BIG BIG FRUIT. STAIN YOUR TEETH FRUIT. BIG.
I guess it is all relative..but pretty funny. To be fair within their own classification, it was pretty appropriate. The thing I find most odd with this is, except for maybe some of the normal (light bodied) wines, none of the reds are probably appropriate for food...or at least not anything except a big steak...Just seems a bit...well, stupid.
Highlights:
Mistletoe Reserve Chardonnay 2009. This has been cleaning up at shows. This won a trophy at this show. Forgetting about awards (because I could really care less), really nice attack on this wine. Good acidity that tingles your tongue. Really great citrus, cashews, good use of oak. Great balance, great length. The Hunter has been making some great Chardonnay lately and this is one of them...
Xanadu Reserve Chardonnay 2010 - As I mentioned for the Sydney show. This wine is still going strong. Seemed to show a bit more acid this time around but an EXCELLENT Chardonnay..I think I appreciate this more and more each time I try it. Too bad it is so expensive...
Peter Lehmann Wigan Riesling 2005. Again another great showing. This is a great Riesling..I don't care how much anyone says shows don't matter, this one always does well..
Lawson's Dry Hill Riesling 2010. Great QPR. Really good acidity and development for only a 2008. A bit of honey, slight petrol notes (not a lot), nice long finish. Surprised by this one.
Reds:
McWilliams 1877 2008. A cabernet sauvignon/shiraz blend...This was a pretty big wine. Good acidity, big tannins, the fruit was still big as well. A slightly better wine than the 2009 (to me anyways) but that could be because of the additional age. Seems like the structure is there, tastes good now as well but it is a pretty massive drink right now.
McPherson Basilisk 2010. A blend of Shiraz and Mouvedre. A cooler climite shiraz. A bit of Pepper and red and dark fruits on the nose. Decent acidity, maybe a tad of menthol a bit of pepper, dark and red fruits. Fine tannins, decent length. This is a pretty good blend.
Anvers "the Warrior Shiraz 2008. BIG bottle. This bottle (along w/ some of the Italian ones) weigh at least twice as much as a normal bottle. This was a pretty big wine out of the "medium Bodied reds category". A lot of dark fruits on the nose, smells a bit sweet actually. I'm thinking McLaren Vale (and yes it mostly is). Good acidity but big fruit. Nice silky tannins. Big but a bit more restraint than I expected. My understanding is it has some Adelaide Hills fruit, maybe that is where this is coming from. Pretty good wine overall.
Penny's Hill Cracking Black Shiraz 2010. Big Fruit bomb. Fun to drink. Actually has decent acidity which makes this a bit more enjoyable. This is a sub 20 dollar wine but drinks like one more than that. Really good QPR, showing quite well (at least the bottle I tried).
There were several other reds that were good...some were fairly well known. Kilikanoon Oracle, Yalumba Octavius..both were quite good but not much of a highlight. The were both fine but I expected more...the Pinots were pretty ordinary...
I think the only wine that still confuses me is the Coolangatta 2006 Semillon. It has been doing very well in all of the shows...Nose on this wine is great..like an aged Semillon. It is definitely missing acidity though and seems a bit flat for a semillon. Other than that it is fine but I haven't figured out if it is just me or the particular judges. All of the semillon I have tried that I thought was great (older Tyrrells VAT1 and Mt. Pleasant Lovedales) had that good acidity as well as the development...This one has the development but no acidity..it is weird....Actually, out of the 3 main Semillons there (First Creek, McLeish and the Coolangatta), I thought it was the weakest out of the 3...*shrug*.
No comments:
Post a Comment